What can I say
The beginning...
We all assume that we are one with the world. A being not
separate to its laws, and consequences. A being alone amongst giants of itself.
Our saviours are humans salvaged by the gods. We know that there is truth, yet we
do not believe it to be solely it. We move in a direction taught to us, and we
conjure up an identity which we relate too and the world.
Succeeding in removing identity (ID) from our lives is not
such a bad idea, if we were to assume that identity is merely a placeholder. An
exception to being suffocated to death on one’s death bed by the gods
themselves. For they seek their saviour, and us also them.
To assume identity is life within itself and not an outside
spectacle enforced. It is to some degree only relative to what we assume what
life is.
I realized not too long ago, that I am more me than I am
supposed to be. For me to relate to humans more, does not make me a nicer
person. Perhaps I understand them better than they understand me, or even themselves.
Tragedy is only without thought. The only reality we possess
is thought. Not action or inaction.
Isaac Asimov once said: Astronauts are dummies. Yet they are
the only ones capable mentally and physically to survive in space. Yet here we
are, and so sadly the astronauts also. On earth away from the moon and Mars.
The stars itself is merely as is. Extremely far away. Maybe that is WHAT they
are. *hint*
Even so, the removal of the self from the self is perhaps
nothing more than allowing yourself to be somewhere else where you are not
literally. Some would call it imagination or thought. Others would assume there
is no such thing as an outer body experience, or the perception away from the
self. Yet here we are always travelling through space and beyond. We even
imagine a world separate from this world. A world where we retire for some
inane reason. A world where we will meet again – in death. But is that world
even required for us to be in for us to experience it? If god,
and yes, I was speaking of heaven, or hell, is all-powerful then he can do
whatever he wants. Right? Not do everything, but anything, which also must
assume everything, though he gives himself the choice also to not do
everything, which is anything. So, everything is out of the question. So, to
give himself choice, and the change of choice, midway perhaps, is only fair
onto himself because he can do anything, which means everything. The difference
between everything and anything is simple. God can type this document, live my
life, live yours, he may be all of it, by choice only, or he can be only some
of it, but not none, because to have choice gives you everything – not nothing
- but not anything. Though there are incorrect options which god is not allowed
to do, because even god must have limits intellectually and perhaps physically
– if such a thing exists.
Write!
To be clear, these writings are not supposed to be seen as
atheistic, or fanatical, or superficial (lack of intellectual data – apart from
words), or even egoistic. No, it is a form of role-play. A way to perceive
possibilities untried and untested by us all. Because we believe the one thing,
the other thing, or opposite, is false. But isn’t the opposite non-existent if
the correct or valid reality exists also? As in, you can choose between heaven
and hell, but not both. Proclaiming even the word “hell” is irrelevant. That is
merely a depiction of how we will understand the process. We will not
automatically change or evolve to interact and partake in the creations of the
gods. These are not answers to questions, ignoring the alternatives. This is
merely as is, a creation of the mind, that understands the same reality
differently. We are not human. We are individuals. We are alone amongst
everything. Nothing relates to us or everything relates to us. Maybe there is
more to reality than we know because we fail to realize it. Science is not
thought based fact; it is proven supposedly. That does not mean they know everything,
or the alternative should be the answer. No, you need to realize first that you
are alone, and that science does not exist, other than to re-boost your ego,
the one denying being dead, like all of us already are. So, this is not
preferential treatment that the religious get, is it? Perhaps they do it, as
some humans do, to pretend to be religious, for what is it other than pretence?
You get atheists, right? You may not get Martians, but you at least get
atheists. So, for them reality is opposing the theory and blabber the religious
spew. Daily five times a day you also go to the bathroom (if you have one).
Maybe you should pray before you take a shit. Like you pray before you eat. Or
before you sleep. Or while you are at work (no offence). The glaring truth
found in man is that he has related reality (god) to himself. He is drawn like
a wasp at a beetle, or a worm to a leaf. He only is man, to himself. To the
rest of us, they are individuals stuck in a prison of someone else’s creation
thousands of years ago. Someone called Caesar perhaps. Someone so powerful he
writes the future. He does not care about the past. For the past is the
present. And the present is the future also. He denies himself separate because
he fears that the ones, he is separate from will hate him or throw him with
rocks or shoot him with a revolver. Strange. I have not seen any mass protests
in Germany, did I? Funny how the news does not cover the most important things
in life. Like being an individual. Not unique amongst other individuals, but
rather to see them as individuals. As medicine has proven. Each man for
himself, but you may also donate your organs. :) Which you could if you want
to. Ask them for a bit of money though. That will not hurt right? We should not
think giving things away for free is better than asking for something in
return. Our ethics is consumer based. We are only what we are because we want
to think that way. As in we prefer the easy way out. Instead of fearing hell,
we praise heaven. If your god is all-powerful then he must prove it and end
this madness in countries where Muslims are killing Christians. And monarchs or
their nationals kill whole communities of Zebra whenever it suited them. There
was no public holiday to celebrate the cull of the most diseased animals on
land. Zebras are clearly confused. They are two completely different colours.
Comments
Post a Comment