Anarchism is Dead

Anarchism is dead, and they killed it.

When you summarize revolution people think you're discussing change. Hannah Arendt said that man is the only animal that will not revolt even if he has to. I wonder sometimes whether my past will haunt me. The time when I was impressionable. The time when I took other people and their ideas seriously. Take everyone's ideas to heart, except my own. I never stood by myself and thought, oh this is my life I can do what I want, and think what I should. And then I heard of the punk music scene and always thought that it was merely that. People with really bad music taste. I thought they would never outshine or outgrow this adolescence. This rebelliousness found in the lyrics and acts of its band members, and followers. I still to this day dislike punk. The music scene can do without it. There's no need for people to salute themselves, and their thoughts, and actions basically based upon something that could've been, but wasn't. It's as if that ideal should exist for it only, and never ever change. And it wouldn't. And perhaps it shouldn't.

Be as it may, Anarchism is revolution. Resistance. Not complacency, acceptance, and domesticated produce, and act. It is not relation. It is death. It is Nihilism. The closure of man. The beginning of Nazism. Even so, Fascism may be the birth child of Anarchism, it is what we may call the beginning of a productive course into peace, and prosperity. The suicide of man. Anarchism is not the crusty punk scene, with their straight-edge victims of the late 20^th century. It is not George Orwell. It is not a quote from a book. It is anger multiplied, and hatred towards the system constantly generated. I must say, even though the system we have in place does provide our basic needs, it is complete destruction, and the effects cannot be reversed. The presumed ownership of man over life. Dominion. Only allows man to be cornered by himself, where resistance is the only relation he has to life. Where he will escape the bonds of Earth, and spread his hatred further for the entity that is God. Now Anarchism wants to end Fascism, but Fascism, as mentioned, is its effect. So it's a constant encircling of prejudice towards hate through non-understanding and non-approval. But how can Fascism be the end of Anarchism? Because that is the only way one can defeat the ultimate form of refusal to obey. Fascism enforces obedience. But also, eradication of those who oppose. And Anarchists are the only ones too.

To consider that Anarchism is non-obedience, and the refusal to uphold any preconceived moral code, and instead destroy everything, and not taking anything for granted, we must assume that that which it wants to destroy, may be in itself destructive also, like Fascism, yet is not, because it doesn't hold man captive for his sake, and desires towards Nihilism. What is Nihilism? The end of all things imaginable. The appreciation of everything dysfunctional, and the lack of need found within what we may consider “existing”.

Possibly we are only supposed to be the way we are since our lives have been placed captive by the police, and governments. But then again, this may just be conspiratorial talk, and will end up getting us nowhere. Basically no one can be sure as to the reality we are facing outside of what we currently experience. Time may be an illusion, and all we see is our end, and not our beginning. We should perhaps consider that freedom is not as it seems, and that we are only what we are, and there is no “it” or “there”. Even under the help of certain substances, we are still captive only to our minds. And our minds, depending on what we are, is only capable of so much. Complexity may be merely the mind unable to fathom simplicity. Boredom. Idleness. Apathy. Consumerism. Etc.

Anyhow, if you're into liberation, you're imprisoned. You're looking for something inside your mind which seeks escape. The goal of freedom is to imprison. As in, the notion of liberation is attuned to our minds for we lack said qualities. Who says the mind doesn't want to learn and grow, and indulge in dead silence of mind and soul? We seek peace, love and harmony for we are in the opposite state. Anarchism is only that which we want to become. Dead and buried without a care in the world. To die in slavery and captivity. And to overthrow our villains to become heroes once more, to die the Judas thorn solely inside again, and again. Or rather what can we expect from man in a situation where he is aware of his absolute fascist ideology of Speciecism towards his own race? His dominion over other animals and the natural world in general. He being the domesticator of all life, and living, and breathing in his own understanding of his own soul, and moral goal towards all things imaginable, which seems hungry, and without substance in this instance?

There is no truth in humanity. All conclusions are false. One should reject all forms, and norms, and even idle times past stuck in saturated boredom, which is the alleviation of boredom essentially, but not the acquisition, as hoped. Boredom is the resolution of truth onto oneself, when your reactionary ideals, and hopes become rather that which one is deprived of. Basically, to quote someone: “One can only have hope through hopefulness”.

So what we seek is what we find. In the end we are what we are, and there is absolutely nothing we can do about it. This is a dangerous world for us all, and the meaning of life is so dreadfully serious. Death.

In essence we can discuss all things imaginable, and so we don't. There are a lot of ideas to be defined. And so we discuss opinions, and debate definitions as we know, and see fit. We only appeal to our own ideas, though to be fair, we are only what we are. For example, a diabetic, well even if you disagree, has to take insulin, otherwise they may go deaf, blind, and mute. Even lose a limb. Also the schizophrenic; now I don't know what a schizophrenic actually is, and goes through, but they are who they are, whether there is a cure or not. Also down-syndrome. There is a specific way how they interact, and behave in this world. We have all been dumb founded by the total lack of interest in autism as well. A whole society deemed normal, and functional with these serious issues to exist. We ignore them when we see fit, and claim allegiance to it also. Though we forget, and we must not. Especially when one discusses science, philosophy, culture and religion. What this has to do with Anarchism though is the realization that within speech, and existence, in general, there is variety, distinction, and appropriate behavior. We cannot claim to stand up for justice in a world where there is already a certain scope of injustice done on behalf of ourselves.

There are certain terms that need description, and explanation, before we can move on.

Nihilism: In some instances we tend to believe that human existence has some goal in mind. Most opinions held by the general public has nothing to do with what was before, and what will come, but rather what is now. There are some though, that work towards us understanding our past, and foresee the future. What is missing though in this dilemma, is life. Life is unpredictable. Life is short. Life is life. Life is what most would call human. That man is alive, and that man has dominion over all things imaginable, for he is man. Yet can we assume that that is true? As in, man is also not man. Man is also animal. Man is also alive like other beings. Man is also only temporary, and non-existent in the future. Man is a footprint in the cosmos. But so are dogs. And cows. And rocks. It is all temporary, but is also permanent.

Nihilism is the end reality of man. Not in the future. Not in the past. But rather the failing present, where he submits to his diets, and his hobbies, and labors, and toils (worries). Nihilism doesn't try to explain reality, it rather explains non-reality. The end of all things. The permanent non-existence of all things. That life is an illusion, and that man, whether scientific or not, is not the center of the universe. Of all things imaginable. Nihilism does not declare only certain things as false, but also certain things as true. It is not a truth. It is a way in time. Man must reject reality completely. Not just some things upheld as truth by certain “ruling” classes, and states. What we see in Nihilism is not expression, or substitute. It's not something that philosophers has exclaimed due to our inability as a species to see beyond ourselves, and to notice God in all of us. The neglect God must've perceived, and done in this reality. The tragedy of life.

Nihilism is not necessarily positivism, but also negativism. It is the absolute certainty, by its followers (which means nothing more), that in its definition is non-existence. That God is dead, and everything is permissible, and that mans' duty is to see what he has to do, and not what he can do. It's not to say that Nihilism plays a vital role in our lives, but rather that Nihilism is our life. Not that it is a facade, our lives, but rather what it is cannot be defined, because if it is, then we are sorely lacking the initiative to consider the whole. An Eastern notion, upon a Western reality.

Basically what this all means is that Nihilism is not the exclusion of ideology from man, but also all other things imaginable. His routine. His experience. All a notion upon which we rest our lives, but fail to notice exactly where we are. That our minds, and souls, are created by something other than ourselves. Nihilism is fact declared, and not opinion upheld. As in, we can only believe what we must. In relation to others. In relation to ourselves.

Yet what was mentioned about difference, and diversity? If we were to see life as essentially corrupt, and not idealistic. Where our decisions do not matter, for it is non-existent, then Nihilism plays its tune. Not that we do not exist, no but rather that we cannot exist. That all rebels are impotent, and that rage, and disconnection, and resistance is futile, and inefficient. Basically non-existent. I must stress that the secret to life, is death. That with God being dead, we are no less alive than before. Our masters uses force, because they are allowed to. Should we resist to exist? Much has been said already, but to summarize; Nihilism in its classical sense is not the absence of belief in morality, and State, and Church, but rather the reality behind all things imaginable.

Time is running in, and out. Over, and above of what is expectant. The ones who rebel, and define, miss one essential point. We are only what we are. We cannot be more than what we are. Our experiences may be false, and illusory. Or rather, it is. Since death is the end of life, then we've been dead before being alive. Even so, the rebels do not rebel. They fail to see them not as human. Not as relevant. Not as important and influential. Rather as ignorant as can be. They are the metropolitan, cosmopolitan cows in a rut that we cannot see, or believe to agree with. In essence we will not be as it may be, a 100m for one is for all. Can we assume anything else?

So what is the issue? Where does the confusion come from? The need to be human. The need to be superhuman. To be savior, and creator. To not be isolated. To be what one is. Anarchism in relation to Nihilism is stagnation. How can the Anarchists, that do not raise their AK-47s, and grenades to State, and Church explain themselves, and define themselves as Anarchists (terrorists) if all they do is do potlucks, book fairs, and charity work? Anarchism is not Socialism, or pacifism. It is the end of all things imaginable. It is the step towards Nihilism. But then again, Nihilism already exists. Anarchism is merely a representation of reality. It is not reality. We will always be separate from reality if we persist in believing that our opinions matter. That our actions are real. That we are as we are only relevant upon the nature of our selves, our relation to “society”, and reality outside.

How does the definition or reality of Nihilism define, or influence, the notion of Anarchism, the structure without hierarchy? Well in this sense we first have to find a concept that bears similarity unto Nihilism, or even see it as its equal. In this sense I see Buddhism as its goal. The absence of self in reality. The absence of reality in the self. True enlightenment. True existence. True expression. Buddhism is the expression of Nihilistic thought. Anarchism is merely a conjunction “some” humans find in their day to day lives distracted from the essential goal, and state of life. Man is a part of life, his mind can be not, but still is, which causes a fracture to occur, a sense of self separate from that which is. Reality. Or rather existence.

Since existence is the parent of reality. The measures of time, and space. If there is a fracture, a barrier, a sense of separation within the individual in relation to existence, then there may be psychosis, or fallacy, found inside the life of the individual, which can cause a dislocation, and misunderstanding, and misrepresentation within, inside, reality. A wasted life. Nihilism is the reality found really, though a turn away from Nihilism is still in relation to Nihilism, but also be the expression of experience, a cause of Nihilism. The cause is the cause is the effect. The effect is the effect is the cause. We can creatively express reality. Not just a select few.

Reality is sad. Is mourning. Is troubled by our misconception, or distracted minds. Our schism in conjunction to reality. Reality expects, yet some ignore. The Anarchists of today think we should use philosophical means, and existential atheistic means to create, and explain, and perceive reality. All our ideas are not our own. They assume that the motto is live, and let live, as long as we respect, and find respect.

The main motive behind nihilistic thought is the exclusion of the self from reality. Not just certain aspects. Nihilism is not existentialism. It is not relation. It is merely that which is without.

In rebellious terms we are only that which we are, not what we believe. We are human for a reason, but can we be sure that this is what we are supposed to be?

Alienation: Though the individual exists within his, or her own scope, they also duly matter to the outside world. An individual exists basically then, internally and externally, whether they know of it or not. How complex, yet complete is such an analogy? The individual strives only to exist. Where it fails, it fails, and society also. Even the lone hermit is found inside society, whether he or she wants to or not. Because, society is external reality. Is scope of impact, and change. One lives only in oneself, and society. That's what individualism is. A comparative study of man. A way to express isolation in a globally united world. Only the illusion of unity is created though, and only through our senses does it exist, or even matter. The individual in medical terms is complex, and should or should not be overshadowed by respect, and care. Only the individual knows suffering. Existence, in classic terms, reality, does not suffer. Yet the wind howls. Yet the sky cries. And yet it ignores our plight. We are only the result of what has become, and what will be. There is no difference in space, and time. All is in order, and all will come to pass. Even God, and the superman. Time waits for nobody, and so somebody has to tell everyone else something, someday, right now. But he can't! Only CNN or Time-Warner can do that. We care, because they are. In which world would we have lived if not for the mega-conglomerates of today? Where's my oranges gonna come from, cries the monkey. Where's my apple juice gonna hail from cries the lazy dog. So much depends on the society we live in, and solely “it” has been created by the individual. God, as mentioned before, is the original creator of all things imaginable. Abraham his chosen “father” went out, into a world not automated by government, and technology, to see what is true. Is God even real? Moses had the same issue. He couldn't believe in the reality of God, but he had to be convinced. For the sake or loss of humanity. I do not know.

And so we must admit, that the individual has lost all sense of understanding, and uniqueness in a world created for him, or her. The whole reality defined. Even his very existence has become nationalistic, and idealistic. He wants only what he can afford, but is promised the world. He is stuck within Capitalism, and Communism, or rather that which modern-day Democracy claims to be. This is not revolt in progress, this is admittance of defeat. Man will never overcome society, it will control life above all else, and if it fails, so will man. That is why, I say, Anarchism is dead, because the corpse ain't moving anymore. All required tools must come from somewhere, but is found nowhere. Some would obviously disagree, and find themselves short of change, but what is the true motive of truth if all else fails completely? What difference does it make if a man can swim, but not forever? He is not a fish. Our whole existence is human. We demand subordination. Yet surely this is not the only reference to alienation? Because man is alienated from man through that which makes him so. Society. Society has become the ultimate culprit in reality. Man will stand up, and die for it. He will kill his fellows for it. He will rage against all else if not for it. Basically he is only that which he thinks he is. So much can be said about this. So much can be used to describe this malady. Either there is an idea or an icon (something substantial) that determines our selves. The individual is alienated because he has no more say in society. The thing that has created him. The thing that saves him every single day. Our reality does not exist within the external reference of man, such as plants, planets and other animals, though that is solely which gave him life. Society, created by man, creates man. He is in turn alienated from it because it is all he has, all he is, all he wants. He is only that, and will never become anything else. Even in a structure of creation and invention, man is still only resolutely defining his reality upon society. Even if the Sahara is as big as it can be, nowhere else shall you find man otherwise. He will always be man, alienated.

Interim: As this treatise deals with the never-ending search for submission unto reality, and the escape from utter boredom, and eventual death by suicide/genocide, I must submit that what is true, and real is not in relation to anarchy, but rather that death is the end. The end of this reality. The end of existence. The end of life. Maybe the satanists are right, though they do come across as fully human, and trying their hardest to escape the pain of the method, and the method of the pain. Whatever that means. Basically seeing the light in the darkness can make you blind.

Labor: Similar outputs have raised the issue that man in himself is an automaton, though he fails to realize it. Why else does man submit easily to Capitalism? He submits all possibility upon an end result. A known, but unknown journey. A way to see life, and death. Capitalism has become the playground for man, and the playground for automaton. Man cannot distinguish reality anymore, and only substitutes reality with scapegoat herding. So he loathes idleness, and progress (change). He merely acknowledges that he is what he is because of who he is. The time for human beingness is no more necessary. We have already proven life to exist. Quo. We are found in our own reality, but our actions speak loudly.

The creation of reality bound man to his passions. He now submits, on a daily basis, his own intent upon the living. That he has to earn his keep, and gainsay his existence, if it is futile. As in, if he is poor, he suffers. If he is unemployed, he's lazy. We have tolerated oppression for too long, and that is why we do not realize it anymore. Now we only see the end of man. The end of humanity. The beginning of a new age. The machine age. We want so much to happen, and we are oh so gentle, and unique, yet which wasteland do we occupy? Fallout? Which land has been found upon freedom without war?

Labor in itself, the creation of Imperialism, is only required to set a certain standard, but how long can we deceive ourselves? How long can we manifest a reality that is not our own? In the beginning there was God, in the end there is, and will be, the Devil. A face of tolerating intolerance. That progress is a missile, or a bomb away. That we have only found freedom through death. That the living have brought it upon the dead, a reason for being. But for how long will we be able to exist? For how long can we tolerate intolerance? Only for as long as we exist. And why do we exist? Because we have to. We have to be there until the end. We have to realize the truth. We must acknowledge that life is not love, it is death.

The original point, as to the existence, of the requirement of labor, is to some extent, our own to find. Define. The poor needs to work, and the rich need to be cleanly shaven and smelling fresh. Like almond oil, and cranberry juice. The best things are natural if consumed, and everything else non-human is, or should be at least, not resembling death. The whole debacle is to some extent ours only to see, and create. Our whole life measured as to what we consume. No wonder there are abnormalities, and disease through over-consumption.

While man shops for a cleaner life, and a purer existence, with or without God, he has to understand his culture. His heritage. It is conservative, and boring. It is what it is, because man is dumb. He knows no difference as to what is required of him. His duty is to State and Church. In essence, man should not be paid for being human, only. He should not think that he becomes dirty, or hungry. Ugly with age. Guilty with experience. Only in so far, that he exists, can he be 1. religious, 2. clean, 3. conscious, and lastly 4. alive. He can only be those things in a living state, so the governments of the world, and Monarchs and Imperialists have created, State and Church. A benign idea, and ideology, but highly effective. Highly enforced. And highly required for subordination. Labor is then the creation not of freedom, but of slavery. And did we not salute the end of slavery through the acceptance of ideology, and control, and government?

Anarchism, in itself, historically, has tried to create the idea, the illusion, of resistance to oppression, and hierarchy, though it has failed on all fronts. Firstly because, to “decide” is a hierarchical reality. Placing power in the hands of the performer. It is what sets conscious living beings apart from unconscious living beings. Life is the ultimate victor in this tale, but Anarchists have not made it clear whose hierarchy they want consumed onto our very present, or historical, lives. For example, the end of hierarchy represents an idea, but also a reality, though to what purpose does the abolition of hierarchy serve? Nature in itself is a strange segment of life, though it is quite clear that it is not only human. To be obsessed with the liberation of man, and to realize peace, and freedom, also has a consequence. The dreadful realization that man is only an animal suckled into bondage. He is what he is, due to his historical dependency on nature, and humankind. He has become a slave to his own passions, and has been transformed permanently by himself, and other entities. Some call it a meme, others call it a generational gap. Even so, in relation to the requirement of labor, and hierarchy, in the workplace, and society, is to some extent not a democratic concept as we believe, but rather an oppressive force created by oppressors, upheld by the minority elite.

We submit, in the workplace, to exclusion, and the disenfranchisement of our personal selves. Of the impression that we serve a grand purpose, only to believe in our existence, and the measurement of our identity as a society. Anarchism, or Anarchists, try to dissolve this illusion through propaganda, yet fail to consume, and admit, that they in themselves, have placed it upon themselves, to occupy a certain sphere of upbringing, and expression, which only serves a purpose within a certain state, and frame of mind, religiously, or obsessively. Labor is not to be abolished by Anarchism, it is to be enforced. Therefor, Anarchism is the founder of Fascism, because power is absolute only once it is absolutely power.

Let's define what we mean by “the workplace” or “space”. It is the reality of conformation. The specific expression of subservience, and tolerating intolerance. It is to some extent witness, in itself, God himself, that perceives man under the umbrella of oppression without knowing. Without explaining the definition of what we consider to be “freedom”, but rather it is, as being “slavery” or “captivity”. We are only what we are, without action or expression, though we have become, mentally, something else. Something resembling slave, automaton, or victim. We are not innocent though. We still feed the fire of Babylon.

But no ideology or movement expresses the need for realization, and self-identification, in our world today. Except, perhaps, Zen Buddhism. Which is Eastern Nihilism. Zen is not slavery. It is resistance, but through inaction, and non-perception. To know without observation, but rather through the articulation of expression. That life is poetry, and that poetry is life. That reality is only what it can be, and not through rhyme, or expression of vocalized formations, and action in such an effect, but rather the removal of self from the self. The removal of life from life. That death is liberation, and that life is unique, but falls short for living entities, that is enslaved by the grip of God, and nature. What I mean by poetry, is the exclusion of life from life. The creation of emblem without hierarchy, and governance. Not in expression, I reiterate, but rather in inaction. The observation of inaction, and not performance, and essentially, labor.

Interim: We are not allowed to be free through those that imprison others. Humans are the prison wardens, and so the ones who exclaim themselves as not human, have to submit to their oppressive ways, and ideas. We should always remember Fascism, and realize that the tyrant is not a tyrant anymore, but a hero. We live, and we die, but we will always be forgotten. The ones who care about life only does show for profit margins, and defect free realities of their financiers.

Tyrants, and tyranny: As was mentioned before, a tyrant can only be found in a realm of differing opinions. (Sooner than later everyone became a part of the drama. A part of the illusion away from the truth.) A tyrant wants to be everyone's friend, but also everyone's enemy. Man plays that role perfectly. He assumes control over some thing that is apart from him. He only feeds on that which he consumes. He only wants what is his to begin with. Since God is dead, and all things resistible, are also, man can do as he wishes, which is the foundation of tyranny. Our whole ego driven society is blinded, through profiteering, and engineering, of the things that matters most to others. Especially other species.

Life is a matter of death. Tyrants never die, but they are easily forgotten, or ignored. Whether or not we believe, luckily someone, or something created time, and space infinitely. Spent more time on creating resources than consuming them. Consumerism is the idea that there are infinite resources to be consumed, and that man is the sole inheritor of Earth, and space beyond. The age of man has made man a tyrant, but Hitler will always be 'the tyrant'. The creator of oppression. The slow process of sucking the life out of life, and ending it abruptly. We now shake hands with oppressors, and convert them to Capitalist dogma and Demo(n)cratic ideas and ideals. We salute armies, fearing an enemy unknown, other than us of course. The only enemy to exist. For what is the purpose of military, or the machines of war, if there are no resistors, or oppressors? Are we to salute Generals and Presidents for the sake of custom?

Strangely enough, stuck on that thought, the Capitalist machine, or dogma, expects competition. Though what is the purpose of competition? What is the purpose of borders in the cosmos (space)? Will our salvation, and liberation, be the creation of our actions, or someone else? If competition is required, such as in sports, do we truly assume that men are stronger than women, based on distinction? Or the other way around, where women produce things separate from the manly reality effaced by the queer guy? Why should we salute expense, in a land of income? Is Socialism, a branch away from oppression, and rather the communal Capitalism, in so terms to speak, a necessity for us to allow, for the sake of eliminating competition, or deprivation, or inequality? Surely the world is a big place, and science playing its role, and religion cleaning up the mess, to believe there are no contradictions. Yet here we are...

This essay is not a creation of despair, rather the lunacy found in sanity. The ideal that freedom is ours to consume, which we fought for. That our dignity rests on nationalism, patriotism, and idealism. Now, we have painted many things of the enemy, and so we fight our demons, though still these “monsters” are non-existent to most. Which is where our story ends.

Police: In regards to the civil code, we can assume that life in itself is a haven of some sorts for humans, though isn't it strange that life in itself has no need for life? As in what we assume to be real is not a necessity of reality. That existence is in itself a scapegoat for all belief. That all belief rests on belief. That without belief there is unbelief, or non-belief. The story must make a turn towards the resemblance of truth, and so we seem sure that knowledge is power, and that power is the maintenance of this said knowledge. Not that knowledge in itself creates power, but cognizance, and awareness, and essentially truth. That what is real is true, and what is true is real. We may believe that includes ourselves, but sadly it does not. We are semblances of truth, not the fact as is, because said qualities do not exist at this very present moment. Yes there are babies being born now, and devils being razed, and people of all ages, creeds, classes; dying. The police is in itself what the Superman represents. He doesn't relate with the press, or the Presidency, or the Monarchy, but to the police. Batman as well, but who cares about him? :-)

This is merely a notion of expressing that there is or is not a need for the police. Yes, we have what we may call, a moral code, but is it necessary? Should we exclaim again what was said and done already? Is life to such an extent conclusive as to human existence? Is human existence conclusive? As in, if I were to submit a docket about life on Earth will there be the exact same semblance onto this day and age of what was and what will be? Jesus is what was, and supposedly will be. Or are we mistaken to take into consideration that which is and will be? As in, can we assume that life is the miracle? The cornerstone of belief, and knowledge. He died for our sins. And what about police officers? They die too. Or so we think...

In any case, in relation to our current argument, bearing the status of “Anarchism is dead and they killed it” basically relates Anarchism as an entity given birth by its foot-holders, its participants, that it is I, an Anarchist. I not as me, but as you. The script written by three lonely Jews hunting living and breathing babes in barnyards and horse stalls. Meh...

No, this is not some case study of the birth of Christ Jesus, but rather the alienation and subjugation Anarchists try to alleviate themselves of, by declaring that there is an outside reality they exist in, and an internal reality which they express solely for themselves and others. That in itself there is Anarchy only through them and “nature as god” and not “God as Nature” as such.

The police are considered an oppressive forces resisting the Anarchist trend, and therefor is despised by them. Also understood in the way that the police are merely hired armed guards for the government and its desires and goals. Its “law” and “order”. The police in themselves though, to give them credit, does have a difficult job on the hand. One, reality is real, as in disturbing things can happen, and does, and the police has to maintain order and decency when it comes to crimes such as murder, rape, hijacking, kidnapping, and robberies. They have to deal with these issues, whereas we expect them to. Even the Anarchists, though they do not accept that reality is real, as in that it is the way it is experienced and perceived, has to admit that the field of criminal acts (the disregard for altruism) has to be focused and perhaps remedied, as they want the society they occupy to be saved or cured of its hierarchy and bureaucracy.

Anarchists tend to believe that “utopia is only arising in the present” as Bookchin wrote. He claimed that an Anarchist is someone that refuses to obey expectations from others. It's a personal journey in his opinion, whereas the utopia as mentioned is only “as far as Anarchists exist”. He deems it necessary for there to be a “resistant” class. The ones who are enlightened. How that differs from Buddhism and Hinduism I do not know, but it is clear that Anarchism is not solely a Western idea, and not related to border and creed only.

What ought one to resist except the exclamation of deemed correct obedience. Disobedience, in the modern Anarchist view, is liberation, and that is essentially where Anarchism ends in the Western world. That the Western world is beginning to dominate the rest of Earth through the expansion of Capitalism and Democracy is something that real Anarchists have to take into account, for what is a war without an army to fight it? They have to assume that reality has been hijacked by the corporate nations and governments. Where business is flourishing and only some benefit from this mess, if only in delusional terms.

Anarchists need to accept that through difference, is not division, but rather defeat. They ought to unite, but the whole purpose of Anarchy is to create the idea of individualism, as Bookchin mentioned “is the only right man has”. Within his own choices and needs. We cannot demand anything from the Anarchist commune, but we can at least observe their apathy and refusal to act on certain matters, where dialogue is now monologue, as in this case, and that monologue is based without objective fact, but rather subjective fallacy.

The main motive behind law and order is to subject man to habit, where he once off does not encourage himself to change the course of history. He wants to liberate himself solely for personal gain today, though with law and order comes a price. Too expensive to fathom, and too boring to bring to reality. Only a wild animal knows how to live, and only those animals know how to die. It's the circle of life, and we need to close it. We need to end our beliefs and instead welcome the notion of liberation through exclamation. The removal of oneself from society, and also reality. For one to perceive truth one has to know the truth. Amen.

But, here we are back in space and time, and words cannot define what is real, and that what is real is here right in front of our evolved states where we must remove “species” (division through classification) from our thoughts and indeed rather acknowledge that even as Anarchists we tend to rely on the workings of others, and not to forget there are those who are not medically able to manage as part of the commune, and where the commune can submit to caring for the “disabled” individual miserably. Sadly this is the most purposefully ignored part for the false representation of Anarchism today. They believe in Nietzsche's revival of Christ. The acceptance of defeat. Most people tend to live only in the present, forgetting the past, and taking note of the future. This is where Anarchism today also fails. How can one assume that if the Son of God cannot resurrect, that humanity, through Anarchism, which is its goal, can resurrect from its bitter past, and denialist views in relation to the importance and dissociation of nature in itself? Nietzsche clearly said that man is the killer of God, and that God is an innocent in this crime.

Nietzsche also has proclaimed the importance of the Dionysian, but failed to mention that the Dionysian is merely a representation of reality and not reality itself. He believed, which some members of society has denounced as mere fancy, that suicide is the ultimate sacrifice, whereas Jesus was murdered by the State (Jewish/Hebrew). Anarchists remove themselves from responsibility only in so far as proclaiming they are human. As in, we are what we are, so forgive us for our sins. Though reality is completeness and not relation to idea and ideal. Anarchy is not represented. That is conservatism. The exact thing Anarchists try to refuse to obey and allow to exist.

Interim: We are situated in a world where our lives bear no more significance to responsibility. Our whole social sphere has created dependence upon independence. The suffrage of truth upon falsehoods. That we have become easy prey for a vicious and well-oiled machine created by Fascism. We run to the ballots to vote and cheer on our oppressors. Whilst they profit and expand, we lose out and diminish. The system is generated, or has been generated, to expose the flaws in our society to uplift the rich, and make it a worthy goal, to be rich, and not poor. We are only what we are and nothing, no-one, else. We cheer for our leaders and enforce response. If we don't, supposedly, the Fascist/Communist regime will engulf us, and destroy all forms of existence. Though, is it true?

We're in crowds to regain some momentum lost in our past and breathe life into our futures. The system, manufactured, by Chomsky and Co. is a result of our inherent failure to look past the indiscretions of others. I mean, why else would he speak, except to enforce the quiet resolve towards utopia, which will never occur as Fromm said that “the angels of God are nowhere to be found in this realm to aid us and guide us... Our belief in God supposedly grants us guidance and so is resolutely preached, but one cannot find a society salvaged by greed and apathy, even though that is all that exists.” Or something like that. :-)

Be as it may...

In retrospect we see an individual that stood up against the state and the church. The ventriloquists in this tale. He raised so high above tyranny that he himself stood tall. This may be the story of Jesus Christ or this may be the story of the Buddha. He rose above all else, and denied, denounced, and recreated a utopia for man, though he knew it will eventually fail. This is the story of Anarchism told by those who reject it. Those who know that resistance equals death, either by suicide or murder. Execution is no joke, and it happens whenever, wherever. We will all see what we know.

Side-notes:

1. Nevertheless we can only fault ourselves for what we have become. The retaliation of those who are imprisoned will be meaningful and deadly. We can not change our lives without changing the future.

Daily Crimes: Surely man, in all his forms bears consequence upon his actions. As in, it's not only the political elite, and wealthy that lives life on this planet. We do not mind, here in South Africa, to point fingers at the government and rich for being apathetic or corrupt, whilst forgetting ourselves in this scenario. We are only what we are, and not what others make us out to be. Until proven guilty right? We should embrace a future present in relation to asocial and anti-social behavior but only to the point of incorporating change necessarily. Or perhaps this asocial behavior is merely a result of neo-liberalism and super-capitalism in a metropolitan/cosmopolitan state. Such as the refusal to obey in New York City, and the need for greed and demand in the financial district and downtown locales. We are encouraged to support the system, and if we don't we will falter, or we retreat into the bundus to live a life away from the supply and demand of the growing wealth of capitalism or should I rather say the debt. The necessity to clear slavery from the face of man, where his enslavement is self-assigned and self-created.

The foreseeing future: We are always of the idea that we are what we are as we see ourselves in ourselves through others. That glamour is bought and found on our skin, as if some Chinese 12 year old dressed us for our prom night every night. But no, there are trusted and famed brands delivering what is required. A gluten free glutton free reality surrounding our perpetual enslavement to Capitalism that feeds us to drown us in hunger and thirst. The fast food nation is non-existent. We just pay for it. The oasis is a golf course meant only for those with the right shoes. Now all we know is that in itself it is wrong to be poor, even though the point of Capitalism is to make everyone rich to feed this generous cow, or should I say bovine, or crab-like monster smoking pipes for the sake of profiteering and creating the reality that man is bound upon tradition and self-reliance or reliability to make up his own mind, like driving at a certain speed alone without knowing who's behind you, or who was there before. Anarchists deny though that Capitalism was created for the betterment of man. Even doctors today are starting to realize that all in all the quiet Austrian retreat for heart specialists and brain surgeons is a pipe dream created by Politicians and Monarchs to further exploit those not knowing that they are being exploited. Forced against their own will. At least I wasn't there, and they were drunk and had a fight and a party.