The Story of Life (in progress)

The story of life.

 

Introduction:

 

Isaac Asimov once said that druids knew nothing of the solar system because they were druids and not astronauts or astronomers. Steven Jay Gould said that Isaac Asimov knew nothing about druids therefore could not make a final judgment on the state of space. The argument is found required in the sense of space, and its totality of scientific wisdom.

I declare that the climate of Earth is more profound than the technology for eternity of man.

A car is a silo for fuel. The fuel wants us to consume it. To become one again with the atmosphere.

Petroleum companies sponsor Toyota and the Olympic Games in Japan, and not a refugee camp.

More money is spent in one second than we produce. The economy is what it is because we cannot do without it. As in the economy is us, and we are the economy. Therefor Aristotle was wrong to say that humans are political animals, especially since Anarchists argue that humans today are not even politically active and therefor have employed people to be called politicians for them – and we dare challenge their imaginary authority. It’s like Trotsky said, “governance is for the poor and the meek”, yet we believe the poor are financially inept or disabled and not corrupt. We should feel sorry for the murderer, for he must live with his guilt. Whether in a prison or a detention center or on a farm for hippies, he must admit daily, every second, his denial to himself as the perpetrator of a crime not found on a smartphone or a computer, but no, where no undo button exists, as is, in life.

 

Chapter one: Space.

 

We have come to the realization as usual that our lives mean more to our lives now for progress is worth ignoring for destruction. We run after an illusion created only by ourselves. Our reality is merely as is experienced by us. We believe that we are the most intelligent and sophisticated animals or being known. We even assume that we can know things which we are not capable of. Yet we know of things which we are not capable of also, like flying like a bird or a butterfly. We assume that a plane or a paraglider gives us the sense of flight, though I argue it is not the case for to utilize your penis to have sex is different than using a vibrator. Also, the thought of a condom comes to mind. Some men like it rough and ready, while others just use it bareback. A woman knows the difference, right? Perhaps she likes fast cars and not slow boats. Or maybe a motorcycle and not a cartwheel. Excitement is only as is, a feeling of removal from what one is, and what one is capable of. One does not believe excitement to exist, if one were numb or paralyzed. The mind isn’t capable of pleasure. Only the heart is. The heart is an organism within our bodies, clearly, so we must take it easy, and respect it, by respecting ourselves. Count your blessings that you even have a heart. There are some who has their removed for it is ill and is dying.

 

Space though is what it is, an exception to liberty. It enforces us like a black iron prison. Philip K. Dick said it first in Valis supposedly.

Jokes aside, the phenomenon of reality and its supposed limitations to us as sentient beings, is that what it provides us, which is life, can be considered by a drug addict or philistine, as a given motive to existence, as in it is what it is for us and only us. The highs and the lows. Mood or emotion is merely temporary imprints imposed on our minds as a precursor to what we can also experience. We salute the age of time, and the absence of sense. How can a bunch of clowns entertain themselves, like in a circus, for so long without even knowing that the entertainment is merely a programmed state enforced by themselves upon themselves for the sake of motive and time restraints? As said before, why tolerate insolence if insolence is intolerable at first. Romance in a cosmic sense has some purpose separate from us all not partaking in the fondling and cuddling. It is a private affair as pornography is not supposed to be. We try and imagine ourselves as individuals in a cosmos not even aware that we exist. So, we must conclude eventually that our lives matter more to ourselves, than our lives matter to something else, like a koala bear, which is a homophobic animal.

 

What is trying to be said about sentience is its inability or refusal to embrace the non-sentient state. Non-sentience is the proclamation of existence within itself programmed by itself unknowingly. The most effective tool to use is probably something non-sentient. Like a tractor above the cattle-plow. The motorcar instead of the cartwheel. The plane instead of nothing else, I guess. Creation may not even be sentient and therefore could be oblivious of its creation, itself. Yet we are sentient, and therefore some may argue that the purpose of this realization is the realization of consciousness, when consciousness within itself is merely the consciousness of oneself, one may even not be sentient. A plant may experience life, as my ex-girlfriend once said, or a rock, but my argument against hers, is that the experience is not necessarily consciously experienced as we supposedly do. Our brains are active upon arrival, or dead, or disabled, yet we cannot claim that our existence, is mentally even conceived. There is a big hoo-hah about psychedelic substances like marijuana and acid, and even perhaps alcohol, that creates the impression of liberation of the conscious mind consciously more aware or aware of things not aware of before, like thoughts, which may construct in the drug abusers mind, that they are wonderfully in tune, more, with this reality, which is not conscious of it, though the conscious animal, may only be aware of consciousness, and not non-consciousness. So, to assume that the conscious mind yearns for a conscious creator or creation is perhaps the only reason why the existence of God is brought up in theological and spiritual circles. It is not bound to consciousness alone. The human being experiencing a human existence must in some way believe that it is a human that is conscious, whether it knows it or not.

 

Drug abuse does not condone experiences separate from reality given by a conscious or non-conscious entity. The use of drugs is not there to create the illusion or realization of liberation for the sentient being experiencing this, may not be guaranteed to walk out of that room alive. Violence therefor cannot be condoned due to the realization that the human animal is only aware of itself, and this violence practiced is merely it being violent towards itself. It relates violence as punishment and to subdue the mind and heart to drug abuse whether one drop or two, is punishment through violence. Abstinence is also the removal of the human self, experiencing a realization of its reality separately from what it may not perceive itself to be. But one cannot escape consciousness, one is doomed conscious. The realization to come too, is that even if consciousness does not end, as in some religious zealots believe, the existence of this consciousness does not necessarily exist within this conscious state where consciousness supposedly ends due to death, paralysis, or a high. We eat and consume consciously unconsciously. We try now, in the year 2021, to believe that we are more conscious than Adolf Hitler, and perhaps Jesus Christ, but who are we to question our reality ever, if this is the only reality we have? Philosophy.

 

In all honesty we are travailing constantly on a bridge with no end. The simple truth is that our lives matter less, and become more tedious, as time goes by, for we are but merely domesticated animals. We could live another way, though we dare not too. Every day we repeat the same exercises. We do not dare to challenge our own authority and opinions. We run after ourselves and the hidden cost of our apathy. We utilize now simplified means to extract data, and personalities suiting a Capitalist dogma ingrained in our psyche to create the concept of fulfillment and contentment. There are those though that do not share in this vision, this promise, they merely adapt to what we give them or take from them rather. We think it is in their best interest. Young children come to mind, not from an impoverished background. Or the mentally disabled and insane. We believe in ourselves so much to such an extent that we have forgotten our ancient heritage and our true purpose. We now dismiss the primitive as insanity and ignorance. As something worth forgetting and be disgusted by it. Luckily though there is hope on this planet. The other animals, and plants. The geological and geographical reality that be faces us, has conclusively proven that we are not the only things that exist, and therefore matter. Even if the superficial of God and religion does somehow connect us to our past, it does in no way reflect who we are now. It seems pretentious seeing them worship a deity in a pious manner which they believe to be morality exemplified, which it is not, but practice of a historical notion of liberation, conformation, and denial of separation, through this practice, from the world that surrounds them.

 

The trivial end is now marketed clearly in a consumerist and materialistic fashion, where, luckily, the beliefs and actions of these religious zealots are being turned away from their Gods into the realm of the simpleton looking for an escape (liberation) in this mess created by Industrialist Capitalism.

 

The advent of space travel, or the realization of the possible entry into space travel, has brought about the feeling of liberation, from the gravitational bounds of Earth, by its human inhabitants, which is from my perspective only as is – a sensation of promise, further into our demise of ignorance, and arrogance, because we do not see ourselves a part of it - Earth. We have constructed a version noted clearly for ourselves that our lives are the only thing that matters, and that even so, not all of us matter to each other, like convicts, and dictators in some far-off Communist nations. Our whole notion of life on Earth is about escape from that which we are inhabiting, an organic compound of a certain size only relevant upon itself and that within its structure there is none other than its inhabitants and its legacy. For humans to assume that they are the sole inheritors and controllers of this organic structure, is lunacy, for the notion of ownership allows more for than dictatorship or the idolization of stereotypes found required to keep up this pretentious notion of superiority, which is only upheld by itself, so the realization of truth and possibility is its only crutch to uphold what it requires for itself to be honest with itself, which seems to be the only motive these days away from what humans are not. They are clearly not the planet, they are clearly not the animal kingdom, they are also not the flora, yet they pursue to believe that this removal from these things, brings them closer to it, through the annihilation of totality within its structure of behavior or being. It refuses to associate with this and that but assume that they have the ability through their dissociation, unknowingly, connect with the cosmos and the heavens beyond. Even Muslims believe now in space travel, investing billions or trillions into science and research, for what cause other than to uphold the value, or the permittance of acceptance, for their archaic belief structure, supposedly ignorant of all things related to science or the exclusion of religion from science for some superstitious dogma, or a blueprint for domination through exploration, which is a tedious idea, nonetheless. For us to assume that humans are somehow united under military and scientific advancement is to exclude the tragedy that befalls the convicts and Communist leaders here on Earth. That famine is completely ignored. Deforestation for valuable commodities like cheap coffee and cocoa also. And perhaps the most disturbing of all things, extinction of many species unheard of, living in small ecosystems not protected by anyone, for it is illegal to illegally protect, and unheard for a being to consider the rest of the planet it lives on after it has demolished most of it for the invention of Imperialism, Industrialism, Capitalism and the rest. Its inhabitants are held hostage without their knowing. You live to die, but before that tip the government and the corporations feeding you this cheap shit. Yes, one can clearly hear the complaints of the complainer, but these are mere observations. Imagine a piece of land, then imagine what it was before. It doesn’t take an exceptional human being with high intellect to figure out that the piece of land may have been inhabited by a vineyard, or an orchard, or a dam, or a forest.

 

The realization of the exploration of Space is very similar to colonialism, and conquest endorsed by loathed Emperors, Kings, and Popes of the bygone age. Now everyone must sign up for this silly idea of peaceful cosmological conquest – through financial expenditure. Thou shalt not kill and respectfully research on Mars, but on Earth, let’s drop nuclear bombs in the desert, and vaccinate the whole population with more poison for some disease which has been totally capable of being avoided, like lung cancer or foetal alcohol syndrome or high cholesterol and blood pressure, which still has not been addressed by the powers placed in charge by the Democratic puissance as perhaps a crime onto oneself and another.

 

The conception behind this book is the notion of downfall and rising. Like water there is movement even in stillness. What falls does come up – eventually. Nature within itself yearns only for acceptance, though the human species will never for they believe they can do as they wish, which they should, for to acknowledge liberty one must be aware of captivity. The motionless wheel that turns at some point for it is a wheel even in decomposition. Once it has decayed complete in motion it will be what it also always was, a notion of nature – its historical past. One cannot generalize, but surely one should. Damning freedom for selfishness is irrelevant for it will end, or it will continue – rise again – and it should. There is not condemnation without forgiveness, and no such thing may exist even if it does.

 

The creation of space is found in the absence of space, where it is hidden it is not seen, where it is seen it is hidden. The dilemma the human society of today faces is that it requires almost all its attention and observation to exist the way it does. It is a machine manlike, yet the notion of failure or regret is only found in the obituary of this dying being. It emphasizes existence beyond its natural limits to excuse its Earthly demise. It ignores cancer until it has found them. It is unaware of things which is yet to come, and that has passed them by a long time ago. They ignore the plight of themselves, and their contradictory nature (form of behaviour) to consume it all away from that which they are not. Oh Lord thou are in Heaven, please forgive us of our sins and give us salvation for we are meek and jealous, and gluttonous. We don’t even recognize how ugly and deformed we have become, where the notion of Space, or the Solar System, has never changed, supposedly. According to the general populace of indoctrinated Democracy with its Liberal attitudes towards consumption, and over-consumption, and the presupposition of indulgence in certain chemical and processed aspects such as food and drink and drugs previously unheard of. That progress is found in wealth, and that our right to control vast amounts of land, even planets, is to such a degree a negative aspect sorely forgotten by these tyrants of behaviour, and expectancy of apathy from those who are cast out or downtrodden. You think a homeless person, does absolutely nothing, but suffer? Well, they don’t need to do what we do, because either they have no choice (being cast out by their family and friends and society) or they choose to be without anything (or much) because it is a costly affair distracting them from their own ideas and ideals. To assume that the over-consumption of liquor is degrading to a homeless person but not to a rich aristocrat is dumb siding the whole notion of what this poison is, and what it does. The acceptance of it, which is sad, allows for many miscreants to push forth their agenda of celebration and fornication, when the homeless person over-consuming this beverage is nowhere to be found in the aspect of advertising pushed through towards a new generation of middle-class alcoholics or alcohol-dependents or alcohol- consumers. It is merely now, a dull version of what it used to be, exclusivity. Now even a homeless person, without any material values or possessions has the means to do exactly what the model and actor and dentist did in years past, without any feeling of regret, for they have nothing to lose. Sadly, the ones to lose something refuse to believe that liquor and the acceptance of its consumption amongst their fellows (being) has a very bad impact on their mental, physical, and spiritual health. It’s not something nature provides naturally so I don’t think it ought to be consumed or allowed in the first place. Bottom line – imagine a drunk astronaut or a businessman getting a blowjob on a fine whiskey. The motto of consuming liquor responsibly is biased for what is that other than a legal slogan required to be able to sell and manufacture these beastly objects of adoration and pretence.

 

This book relates what may be considered the removal of the natural self of humankind towards an artificial or ignorant view of a new form of self that is to be deformed and unintelligent and unsophisticated due to its new religious view of what standard humankind must follow, where if it does not, it is ugly and stupid. This perfect being will slowly decay into nothing, and its majesty will not be known for millions of years on this planet. At some point the grass will become too green, and the air will become too clean. The existence of micro-organisms will be irrelevant, and the understanding of the Solar System will be forgotten. This view of life is deceitful and a faux version of elitism, where nothing is to be gained and no honour to be found. It will be dead inside and found that life must be easy and simple, where all effort will become null and void and where you can literally kill yourself in dignity. An example is the IT professional. Instead of moving and utilizing its body for exercise and movement it rather is stale on a seat pointing its eyes at a screen for hours on end, daily, not knowing, even though it is supposedly intelligent, about its quickened decaying body and mind. It loses all connection to its own biological and psychological reality, where it must now subordinate all other things in its life, mostly, to understand and approve of its unnatural needs and beliefs. This is not to be confused with subordinating the species to a trend of natural beliefs, as some may argue against, as the purpose of this book. It is rather to assume what it is not capable of anymore or want.

 

Try as one might, the whole notion of relevance is found by experience and the absence of. That one believes experience is separate is to conclude that one is separate from reality. Individualism.

 

The collective: What one argues for, others should substantiate, if one were to believe reality is a collective experience, which it is not, even though one may experience that it is, which is only as is, a confirmation of one’s own existence, internally and externally. As mentioned in a previous article, reality is not consciously defined. It is rather the absence of consciousness of the associated being which reality defines. The reality perceived by a conscious being of an unconscious entity inorganic or organic within this reality proves the substantial fact. For there is within, without, it is as is. The motive of this declaration is to remove responsibility and power or authority from the self-proclaimed leader of reality: man, and God.

 

The solar system, for it to be conscious, there must be an explicable justification for why it is, not in purpose, presently, but of its origin. Its source. For we can conceive a conscious creator like God, does not prove its existence or purpose. Its reason for being God, such as the realization of the cause and effect of inorganic or organic non-sentient abstractions perceived and created. Recycling or reusing of core subjects amongst our fellows immediately relatable does not prove meaning behind it, or its existence, just because recognition is not fact, but rather fancy. The sole motive of our perception of our consciousness in a supposed conscious reality denies the grand purpose of existence and places it rather in our sphere of data perceived and directly related opinions. As said, consciousness of reality proves only that you can be conscious within reality, and not that reality is conscious. The final point is that regarding the state of our consciousness, its purpose, is not to realize consciousness externally to us and what we relate to there, but rather close to home, here. Which means when consciousness ends, in death, we become not more part of reality, but rather also reality outside of our conscious lives. Dictation of reality as conscious also assumes that non-consciousness is a part of it. Its opposite. As in the perception of non-perception, to be properly defined.

 

In retrospect, if it exists, space is a culmination of laws, and not the belief of these laws. The subject of laws creating new laws or entities, is possible, though laws don’t co-exist, as in require each other too. They are separate in turn. A law is what some may call a natural phenomenon, and there may be less than we know, for one thing, may be so complex it is all one. The statement of co-existence is not consciously perceived, and neither are we able to consciously perceive laws outside of our natural scope. We don’t transfer to a higher plane, or even a lower one, we are only as is, the result of laws, or a law, being more complex and integrated, as is.

 

The simple reality that faces us has become multiply more complex in our minds, there for our behaviour, our psychology. The depth of study and self-realization has brought me about the conclusion that man is only as is due to his psychic wants. He wanted to traverse this simple and dull and patient reality to become something separate from it. A new being. A human being. He has created much but destroyed even more in his newfound beliefs. One day children will be allowed to be unemployed alcoholic fiends squatting the land and troubling the suburbanites, a vast money-making scheme by the government and property developer’s aka investors. That one invests lazily and make a living or profit from this venture is irrelevant for no man finds fulfilment in easy money or gambling, and rather draws his attention away in his past time to hedonism and sadism. He indulges more into making himself a King and finding himself a Queen. His needs and quality of saturation or fulfilment will come to end, if only in death. His selfishness has spread about the whole species where he now intrudes upon their lives for the sake of some form of realization, itself, modern man. He beliefs that boundaries have been crossed and he is now entitled to refuse interaction with some of man for the sake of arrogance and pride. This is a shame, but totally excusable for restraint to a collaborative existence found in the creative reality we find ourselves in, is a tragic reminder of what has come to pass up till this point in time.