The consumptive slave (work in progress)

In materialistic societies you better treat your workforce like consumers, or they will make demands as consumers unto you, which is ingrained into their psyche through the notion that the accumulation of wealth, and its use, equals to rights, and respect to be granted.

 

In South Africa, from what I can see, the menial worker doesn’t realize its predicament through the assumption that its work is not menial. All that it takes is having the workforce performing menial duties, which is not solely their own choice, be constantly harassed away from what they are, and not what they have become. A means to cut taxes, and uplift communities into damnation, for removing man away from his dream, makes him forget it exists, and how others could have helped him onto the way to the light in the sky.

 

The dilemma that comes into play is the subordinative qualities already assumed by the governments onto its subjects. Nowhere does it say that the people rule the party, for the party is not the people. Voting for the party is merely subjecting oneself to subordination upon the to-be-enforced will of the party, which it assumes itself to be the sole proprietor of, which it can never be. For the party only rules because of the people. Do they though, owe any allegiance back, unto a people that believes in subordination, enforced from a young age, upon us all? The notion of the master guiding and demanding respect and obedience.  This is a degrading aspect of man exposed, which he will never truly realize, for it is him that decides to obey, and find no reason to escape the domination and exploitation.

 

The result is the cause, and the consequence, basically, is the present, where man faces his demise, and exerts influence, for the sake of conformity, and the precious exclamation that he is a symbol of promise, and an example of dictation and behavior. The truth though is that man submits to that which makes his life seem more gentle, simple, and yet complex within perfection or articulation. His motive is seen in what makes him the master over his own destiny, and that of the worlds. He placed himself at the top because he denies that he ever was at the bottom and wants to be again. Though there are others like him, which he oppresses, but again it is not just his fault, but also the oppressed. They can run free, and nowhere will we find them again, our whole structure will tumble into chaos and anarchy, where the master will show his true worth, as an abusive husband running after the kitchen knife just thrown at him.

 

The realization of thought, and its association from that which it’s not, surely ought to not trouble man, so he supresses true motive, which is instinctive instinctively, to be that which he is not, a man of value, governed unto his existence through forcing him into association and subordination. He waits his life away, and never realize the lost time, for how can one if it is gone, and nowhere to be seen or found. The past is only memory, and memory is not substantial, it grates against your cranium like an itch or sore that doesn’t want to heal and go away. So that is why man must ignore, through his own choice biologically and psychologically, the dilemma he has put himself in.

 

The criterion for an enforced structural hierarchy is found in the inability to revolt. Man through his tedious life expects nothing more than what is given. He takes as he receives. His issue is self-inflicted though his wounds are saturated into his skin like a birthmark. He accepts his fate as a step in the right direction, but he will never conclude or believe that it is all for naught where he himself reach for stars unrealized and non-existent. The conclusion to the capitalistic life begs the question of when it will end and cease to be, which is ultimately found in its apparent purpose. Much time and energy are wasted for man to achieve his goals that he forgets upon the point of impact the stagnation and depreciation of his abilities which he was supposed to find and mold. Repetition basically brought forth ignorance of the dilemma caused by the exploitative state of life lived for the future.

 

And so we must believe superstitiously that life bears only meaning to us, where insofar we obey the command and code that dominance is found in hierarchy. For example our role and assumption of force to be grounded against Earth as a factory of some sorts, which we tolerate intolerably, denouncing other beings to a life of exploitation and use under pretense of superiority, which directly correlates as to our behavior towards each other in the public and private hemispheres in relation to democracy and capitalism.

 

This should not be seen as a plea for equality, for renouncing man to work, whether it be meaningful or trivial, is resolutely against his true nature. How one explains how this phenomenon came to be is difficult to pinpoint, and so it must be argued that the present is all that should be held in focus.