Freudling (work in progress)

 What do you mean, Freud?

 

In terms of dense reading from important writers, and thinkers, there’s one author that in my opinion is too difficult to put my head around, and that is Freud. His supposition of understanding the subject matter, and field, of his reader, or the style, and definition (or theory), conversed to the reader, is problematic to the extent, that the uninitiated, or ignorant, misses the value of the ideas brought across, where they then lose interest, or motive, to further the study, of the human mind, by the father of modern-day Psychology. Basically, his study of man’s mind is obscured by a certain method of thought, expected to be known by the reader, but is lost especially because of ignorance or fear of indoctrination unto the supposed theoretical state of his ideas incorporating belief about man’s life, existence, and reality. Which Freud resolutely ignores.

 

The dilemma you face according to Freud:

 

The trouble caused by Western civilization, in its theoretical and practical scope, shows that man must subordinate himself when he reaches a certain age. Biologically he’s the same thing obviously, but not perceptually, and psychologically he may be also, but practically even the large groups remove themselves of such a relation whilst being united. Like football hooligans, they pave roads, filled with chemicals, and compounds, coming from the Earth, molded into something destructive, and evil. (Only within the previously found natural landscape or habitat of course, which is in the consideration of the time, or age of things, that change, in part, is the only truth, which is the beauty of life. An unhalted train going through not what is supposed to be, but which is possible.)

 

Change and adaptation eventually leads to fulfillment, according to Freud’s Totem and Taboo:

 

Even Hitler can confess, and cry (like a little child or heartbroken mother or widow), which he probably will, because God is quite displeased with him, and will fill him with wonder and understanding, so that the man can forgive himself, when he finally meets his victims (the ones that has already forgiven him – though feared him like a rabid dog).

 

Is Freud’s theorems liberating?

 

To escape is not to change, but to conform to said reality is, imposing expected conformity, knowing full well that change is required, and predetermined, like some religious ritual, but is not found, by the man on the outside inside. Reality is bound by escapism, which is not a sole existent entity on Earth. There are though other things to explore, like the Chimpanzee troupe, or herd of cattle, or even a school of fish, which is extraordinary within itself, without constant reflection or judgment from Humans or even the Gods. Behavior though is something tolerated only in groups, whether two, forty or even five billion members.  Excluding the individual, or species from its own evolution, or life. That with age comes beauty or compassion. If one were to not learn this, one will wither away and doom life to its end. Only a positive outlook on life, or evolution, filled with love and compassion for each other, and the worlds, to create something amazing is. Our own heaven on Earth. But the evil men, suffocating us all, the capitalists, make it seem that wealth equals to health, or beauty. Where clothes alter a person’s personality, like a clown, or joker, and even his image. George Orwell said in Down and Out in Paris and London; that man is only himself, and not the community that fed him, and clothed him, or commodities he has acquired over time. Our community cannot be capitalist, and peaceful. The subjection of man onto economic policies politically, has made man evil and unconscious of the world around him. That violence is practiced, and the abuse of resources, comes not from the concept of religion, but rather hierarchy. That man ignorantly tolerates oppression and exploitation. We have only one life, so what if we are homeless? We choose not to partake in the capitalist lie. We didn’t fail, we chose the open road instead, and found ourselves free and filled with wonder, and the sense of adventure. Then society caught up with us, and took us back in, and forced us to wear clothes.

 

The socio-dynamics witnessed, begs the question if our survival conclusively and exclusively should be tolerated on the copulation concept or reality? As in the interaction between individuals should be emphasized on the pleasure instinct. That there is a reason for what is to be achieved if there’s a conscious thought or effort behind action and effect or result. Identity and personality conceived and perceived matters more on deeds within a timely reality. Convincing verbally and physically to an end. Desperation nation.

 

A thought came to me in relation to sexual provocation and intimate relation which is bound to eventual fondling and the culmination of ownership drawn by sexuality.  Whereby it is practically conclusive that the immediate is a foreseeing of the future and direction or goal found within the interested parties spoken about. That the sexes whether bi-, lesbian, gay, or hetero, is of no consequence, for the motive for sexuality is the same. It has the same reason for its existence in its entirety from start to end. This includes everyone, even infants, even though psychologically the thought comes to mind, when one realizes one’s individuality or disconnection from other forms within reality, as most beings do.