The unrealistic policy

Fearing freedom of speech, and tolerating the abuse of it, somehow affects the psyche permanently away from individualism, or identity. One realizes oppression only, once it is witnessed, and once it is understood for the reasons that it exists. So, my argument is, can one legally argue against freedom of speech?

 

The rule of law, does not allow man to break free from his freedom. All is captivity for his own protection. His lenient self. The one who gave up on pioneering. I see every day citizens of this world, happy for no good reason, and sad in turn the same. We should not wonder what the future will hold, because we are part of the past, and have never been in the future, as in we only exist in what we become. So the present is not even real, for time is movement, and movement knows no bounds, or restrictions. For it to have the qualities it has, may be visually disorientating, or regressed from what it consists of. For, it is a certain substance, does not mean it is also not something else.

 

The stories of people seem so predictable like a visual montage I have seen once. How dare a film be more important to my life, than anything else at the time? Because film is a part of life. The production can be digital or physical for in a sense it is still part of this reality. Or we are looking into other realities. We are not the creators; we are the observers. And so, Gandalf grabs his magic staff. Enough said.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Defiance

The Third World War (Draft 2)

human - the non-human animal