The unrealistic policy
Fearing freedom of speech, and tolerating the abuse of it, somehow affects the psyche permanently away from individualism, or identity. One realizes oppression only, once it is witnessed, and once it is understood for the reasons that it exists. So, my argument is, can one legally argue against freedom of speech?
The rule of law, does not allow man to break free from his
freedom. All is captivity for his own protection. His lenient self. The one who
gave up on pioneering. I see every day citizens of this world, happy for no
good reason, and sad in turn the same. We should not wonder what the future
will hold, because we are part of the past, and have never been in the future,
as in we only exist in what we become. So the present is not even real, for
time is movement, and movement knows no bounds, or restrictions. For it to have
the qualities it has, may be visually disorientating, or regressed from what it
consists of. For, it is a certain substance, does not mean it is also not
something else.
The stories of people seem so predictable like a visual
montage I have seen once. How dare a film be more important to my life, than
anything else at the time? Because film is a part of life. The production can
be digital or physical for in a sense it is still part of this reality. Or we are
looking into other realities. We are not the creators; we are the observers.
And so, Gandalf grabs his magic staff. Enough said.
Comments
Post a Comment